- Subscribe
- Log In More
Log in using your username and password
- Basket
- Search More
Advanced search
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Browse by collection
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
Advanced search
- CloseMore
Main menu
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Browse by collection
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
- Subscribe
- Log in More
Log in using your username and password
- BMJ Journals
You are here
- Home
- Online First
- Non-malignant gynaecological disease and risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Email alerts
Article Text
Article menu
- Article Text
- Article info
- Citation Tools
- Share
- Rapid Responses
- Article metrics
- Alerts
Cardiac risk factors and prevention
Systematic review
Non-malignant gynaecological disease and risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-7945Giorgia Elisabeth Colombo1,2,
- Yahya Mahamat-Saleh3,
- Mike Armour4,5,
- Kedar Madan6,7,
- Angelo Sabag8,
- Marina Kvaskoff9,
- Stacey A Missmer10,11,
- George Condous7,12,
- Faraz Pathan6,13,
- Mathew Leonardi14,15
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- 3International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- 4NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 5Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (MRINZ), Wellington, New Zealand
- 6Department of Cardiology, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 7The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 8Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 9Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, CESP, 94805 Villejuif, France
- 10Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- 11Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- 12Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 13Charles Perkins Centre, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 14Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- 15Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide School of Medicine, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Correspondence to Dr Giorgia Elisabeth Colombo; giorgiaecolombo{at}gmail.com
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. Non-malignant gynaecological diseases (NMGD) significantly affect patient health and well-being and may be associated with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (C/CVD).
Methods Seven databases were searched for relevant studies up to 21 April 2024. Observational studies reporting risk estimates and 95% CIs for the association between NMGD and C/CVD were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR) with 95% CI. Composite C/CVD outcome was defined as a combination of ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. The ROBINS-I tool defined study quality and risk of bias.
Results We screened 6639 studies, of which 59 were eligible for full-text review and 28 were included in our analysis, comprising a total of 3 271 242 individuals. The majority (53.5%) of the studies were scored as having a ‘serious’/‘critical’ risk of bias. Overall, individuals with an NMGD had a significantly greater risk of composite C/CVD with low heterogeneity among contributing studies (SRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.37; n=16 studies, I2=65.3%), ischaemic heart disease (SRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.51; n=21 studies, I2=73.7%), and cerebrovascular disease (SRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51; n=16 studies, I2=91.5%). In NMGD-specific analyses, the risk of C/CVD and its components was greater among those with a history of endometriosis or polycystic ovary syndrome.
Conclusions We found an overall association between NMGD and C/CVD across all studies. However, estimates from individual studies varied substantially.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
View Full Text
Footnotes
X @drgecolombo, @AngeloSabag, @mathewleonardi
Contributors GEC acted as guarantor and was involved in study design, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, data interpretation, risk of bias and study quality assessment, and drafting of the manuscript. YMS was involved in study design, statistical analysis, data interpretation, risk of bias assessment, and editing of the manuscript. MA was involved in study design, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and editing of the manuscript. KM was involved in study design, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and editing of the manuscript. AS was involved in study design, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and editing of the manuscript. MK was involved in study design, data interpretation, and editing of the manuscript. SAM was involved in study design, data interpretation, and editing of the manuscript. GC was involved in study design and editing of the manuscript. FP was involved in study design, search strategy, data interpretation, and editing of the manuscript. ML was involved in study design, search strategy, data interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests MA reports a leadership position in the advisory board of Endometriosis Australia. SAM reports participation on a past advisory board of AbbVie and Roche, roundtable participation for Abbott, a position as Field Chief Editor for Frontiers in Reproductive Health; conference travel or honoraria from WES and Mayo Clinic; board or committee membership for current - SWHR, WERF, and WES, and past - ASRM and ESHRE; and grants from AbbVie, National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, Marriot Family Foundations outside the submitted work. GC reports honoraria from Samsung and GE healthcare; participation on the board for International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA), Clinical Data Miner (CDM) Steering Committee, and IMAGENDO Steering Committee; the following leadership positions: WFUMB President Elect, ISUOG Co-Chair Scientific Committee, Head of Discipline OBSGYN Sydney Medical School Nepean, Head of Department Gynaecology Nepean Hospital, World Endometriosis Society Ambassador, Australasian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine DDU Board; receipt of a Samsung ultrasound machine and GE Healthcare ultrasound machine; and grants from Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) (Australia) for development imaging AI in endometriosis, Australasian Society Ultrasound in zmedicine (ASUM) grant, RANZCOG Norman Beischer Grant, outside the submitted work. FP receives consulting fees from Boston Consulting Group and Alpha Sights.A/Prof Leonardi reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Hologic, Imagendo, and Chugai Pharmaceutical; personal fees from GE Healthcare, Bayer, TerSera, and AbbVie; and grants from CanSAGE, AbbVie, AIMA/SOPHIE, Hyivy/MITACS/SOPHIE, Hamilton Health Sciences, Endometriosis Australia, Medical Research Future Fund/Imagendo, and Health Canada outside the submitted work. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in using your username and password
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe